Given the recent debate about using submodules or subtrees, and the occasional issues with sync-all: did anyone ever look into using the 'repo' tool? Created by Google for Android development (AFAIK), but also used by several other projects. See https://code.google.com/p/git-repo/
Nicolas On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 15:41 +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | I think you need to do a 'git pull' first to get the latest version of the > | sync-all script and when you run that you should get a libffi-tarballs > > I'd done that (repeatedly). BUT, as has often happened before, I'd forgotten > that my tree was on a different branch, and pulling of course has no effect > on the branch. Rats. Note to self: whenever anything odd happens, check > you are on 'master'. > > Sorry for the noise > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Erik de > | Castro Lopo > | Sent: 03 August 2013 08:25 > | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org > | Subject: Re: libffi > | > | Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | > | > But ./sync-all get doesn't get a libffi repo. Nor is it listed in > ./packages. > | > > | > Does anyone have any idea where this new libffi repo is, and why it > isn't listed? > | > | Simon, > | > | I think you need to do a 'git pull' first to get the latest version of the > | sync-all script and when you run that you should get a libffi-tarballs > | directory. > | > | Cheers, > | Erik > | -- > | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Erik de Castro Lopo > | http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > | > | _______________________________________________ > | ghc-devs mailing list > | ghc-devs@haskell.org > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
