On 2013-08-20 at 09:48:48 +0200, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | However, in order to facilitate future migrations, git.haskell.org > | should be used, as then we could relocate git.haskell.org to a different > | IP without needing to update the URLs in all documents again. > > Why? If we only had ghc.haskell.org, we could just migrate that > couldn't we? Or are you imagining a situation in which > ghc.haskell.org and git.haskell.org were really different servers? > Trac on one, and the repo on another, say? Hmm. maybe that makes > sense.
Here's some more motivation why a new "git.haskell.org" hostname was desired: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.infrastructure/103 > It'd be good to explain this thinking on the wiki page that you are > developing. will do > | Does this answer your question? :-) > > Yes, v helpful. Please copy paste the answer into the new wiki page! will do > | > 3. The repositories page > | > http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions/Repositories > | > says "this page has been replaced by "Repositories" but the link is > | > circular.. leads to the same page. > > You didn't reply to this. I've fixed this right now; seems the semantics changed for wiki: links in Trac 0.12, so that "wiki:Repositories" was a link relative to "/WorkingConventions/" instead of pointing to "/Repositories". Cheers, hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
