Indeed. There's a few straggling things but overall we're in feature freeze overall right now, right?
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Johan Tibell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan > <b...@serpentine.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > One of the factors that's blocking my ability to build Hackage packages > is > > that Hackage does not contain versions of a number of bundled-with-GHC > > packages that have versions matching the versions shipping with HEAD. It > > would unblock that process somewhat if you were to upload new versions of > > unix and various other packages that are not yet in sync fairly soon, > > preferably well before cutting the branch. Thanks! > > +1. Forgetting to upload GHC released packages altogether (even after > the release) has been a problem in the past. I think we should aim for > making releases of all the packages GHC ships with before we make the > actual release. It will make sure 1) that's not forgotten and 2) > people have more time to fix their packages. > > There's clearly a tension here: GHC might change last minute and break > one of the just released packages again, forcing another release. If > we release the packages once we enter feature freeze for GHC, that > should be a rare occurrence. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org <javascript:;> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs