On 18/10/2013 18:21, [email protected] wrote:
@@ -259,13 +261,15 @@ test('T783',
# 2012-10-08: 226907420 (x86/Linux)
# 2013-02-10: 329202116 (x86/Windows)
# 2013-02-10: 338465200 (x86/OSX)
- (wordsize(64), 640324528, 10)]),
+ (wordsize(64), 734038080, 10)]),
# prev: 349263216 (amd64/Linux)
# 07/08/2012: 384479856 (amd64/Linux)
# 29/08/2012: 436927840 (amd64/Linux)
# 12/11/2012: 640324528 (amd64/Linux)
# (OldCmm removed: not sure why this got worse, the
# other perf tests remained about the same)
+ # 18/10/2013: 734038080 (amd64/Linux)
+ # (fix for #8456)
Yikes! 10% just for that change to CmmContFlowOpt? Are you sure?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
