Hello Malcolm, On 2013-11-04 at 10:28:27 +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > Of course, cpphs solved this problem nearly a decade ago.
Btw, what has been the reason it hasn't been adopted as bundled `cpp` replacement in the GHC distribution in the past? (if it remains a separate executable, its GPL licence shouldn't be an issue -- after all, ghc relies on the gcc executable which is GPL'ed too) cheers, hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
