Conal Email is not good for this. I think it'd be more productive to have a Skype call, with both of use looking at GHC's source code.
If you'd like to do that, do suggest a time. Simon From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Conal Elliott Sent: 07 November 2013 18:15 To: Simon Peyton-Jones Cc: Nicolas Frisby; [email protected] Subject: Re: Finding & assembling class dictionaries from GHC plugins? On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Well, you are writing a function reify :: CoreExpr -> HsExpr RdrName Not exactly. I'm reifying CoreExpr directly to another CoreExpr. (The target CoreExpr calls into an API for GADT-typed lambda terms<https://github.com/conal/lambda-ccc/blob/master/src/LambdaCCC/Lambda.hs>. All works swimmingly as long as I'm able to avoid dictionary construction, but I'm no longer able to do so.) I haven't explored your suggestion of translating to HsExpr instead. Do you know of any plugins that work this way? Do you really believe it would work out? For instance, I wouldn't know where to insert type annotations, and I'd have to back-translate names. I imagine there are other challenges I don't foresee. It takes as its input a CoreExpr and produces as its output a reification of the input. I don't see why you need start by converting Core to HsExpr. Just write reify directly! I wasn't suggesting converting a CoreExpr to an HsExpr. Rather, I was wondering out loud how I might get the type-checker's help to generate Core to find/assemble a Typeable dictionary for a given Core type (since I'm starting with Core). One idea is translate the core type cty to an HsType hty, use hty in a very simple HsExpr like "Dict :: Dict hty" (where Dict is from Ed K's constraints package), use the typechecker to convert that simple HsExpr to a CoreExpr, and then extract the dictionary-forming sub-CoreExpr. Or something simpler along the same lines. Thanks for the help, -- Conal Simon From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Conal Elliott Sent: 07 November 2013 01:08 To: Simon Peyton-Jones Cc: Nicolas Frisby; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Finding & assembling class dictionaries from GHC plugins? Thanks for the suggestion. I hadn't considered backing up to an HsExpr. I guess we'd have to start by converting the Core Type to an HsType to form a type-annotated HsExpr. Am I on the right track here? -- Conal On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hmm. One route would be to build a HsExpr (rather than a CoreExpr) for the reification of your CoreExpr, and stick that into the maw of the type checker. That would hand off all this dictionary construction to the type checker, which is designed for the purpose. Simon From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Conal Elliott Sent: 05 November 2013 23:41 To: Simon Peyton-Jones Cc: Nicolas Frisby; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Finding & assembling class dictionaries from GHC plugins? Hi Simon, Here's some context on what I'm after. I'll try to include enough to clarify what I'm after, without dragging you into unnecessary detail. I have a Core expression, which I'm systematically translating to a related Core expression. The second one reifies the first one, so that the generated code *evaluates* to a run-time (not compile/Core-time) representation akin to the original Core expression. In this second (reified) representation, I need some run-time representation of types. I use Typeable constraints in my representation, and these constraints don't appear in the original Core representation. For instance, I have the following constructor for function application in a GADT of lambda expressions: > (:^) :: (Typeable a, Typeable b) => E (a -> b) -> E a -> E b My reification plugin takes a Core application expression, recursively reifies the function and argument expressions, and makes an expression that applies (:^) to the two recursive results. However--and the point of this thread--I also need to come up with Core expressions for the two Typeable dictionaries. So, to clarify my request, given a Core type representation t, I want to construct a Core expression that evaluates to the dictionary for Typeable t if one exists, or fail if there isn't one. Note that t is not necessarily an atomic type; it could instead be something like [(Bool,Int -> String)]. I'm happy to Skype-chat if it'd help. Thanks, - Conal On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We just don't know how to start - ie how call the right functions from the type checker. Are there any resources explaining the relevant subset of the TcRnIf API? And I for my part don't know where to start helping you! Conal wrote I don't think I need to construct dictionaries for new Typeable instances. I only need to find and assemble *existing* Typeable instances into combinations like Typeable [(Bool,Int -> String)], and I don't know how to do so in a GHC plug-in That's exactly what the constraint solver does. (TcSimplify and friends.) But again I need more context. I gather you are talking to Pedro too? He knows a lot about this stuff. Also there are a bunch of folk (Luite, Edsko) worked on the new front-end plugin stuff, and are much more expert in it than me. We could have a skype call if that would help S From: Nicolas Frisby [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: 05 November 2013 14:36 To: Simon Peyton-Jones Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Conal Elliott Subject: RE: Finding & assembling class dictionaries from GHC plugins? On Nov 5, 2013 3:14 AM, "Simon Peyton-Jones" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > A core-level plug-in can't generate fresh instances. There are some new > plug-in hooks that fit earlier in the pipeline, which can. Maybe you can use > that, and generate a data type decl with "deriving Typeable"? We're willing to do some awkward shoehorning in HERMIT to make this work in limited circumstances. (Hopefully including Conal's.) We just don't know how to start - ie how call the right functions from the type checker. Are there any resources explaining the relevant subset of the TcRnIf API? Thanks. > > > From: ghc-devs > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Conal Elliott > Sent: 04 November 2013 20:08 > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Finding & assembling class dictionaries from GHC plugins? > > > > I'm working on a GHC plugin (for compiling Haskell to hardware), and I need > to synthesize Typeable (and maybe other) class dictionaries for a wide range > of types, including composite types (functions, pairs, lists, etc). Can it be > done, and how? I think I'm mainly looking for mechanics of finding existing > class instances (however they're defined) and assembling them (for > parametrized/composite dictionaries), rather than mechanisms specific to > Typeable. > > Thanks, -- Conal > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
