so what are you proposing? Are you agreeing that those patches work with clang wrapper, but also remarking that its unfortunate that such a hack is needed?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kazu Yamamoto <k...@iij.ad.jp> wrote: > > So did you find a bug in the current design of the clang-wrapper hack? > > No. What I found is that the current design of the clang-wrapper hack > is appropriate. > > "-x assembler-with-cpp" is necessary to rescue > ---- > {-# RULE whatever > #-} > --- > > > If so it'd be better to get it fixed there rather than in the > > Alex/happy setup HS files. > > If we can do this, it's very good. But this is not good enough. > happy/alex hack are also necessary to not generate > ---- > # 1 "<built-inxxx>" 1 > > # 1 "templates/GenericTemplatexxx.hs" 2 > ---- > > --Kazu >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs