My interest is just to get involved somehow in the NCG. Starting a new backend seemed reasonable only because I couldn't break something that didn't exist. ;-) Though cleaning up the NCG would probably be more educational for me. So if that's desired then I'll get involved there.
Cheers, Corey -Corey O'Connor [email protected] http://corebotllc.com/ On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Carter Schonwald < [email protected]> wrote: > I mean next year. I'm hoping to start hacking on it and a few other ncg > related tasks early January with about 1-2 evenings of regularly scheduled > work on it. > > So feel welcome to do a Ppc validate anyways in the mean time :-) > > > On Sunday, December 22, 2013, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> Carter Schonwald wrote: >> >> > I believe there are no current plans to add arm to the ncg. >> > >> > However, I'm hoping to spend a wee bit of time later this year cleaning >> up >> >> Dude, you have 7 days! Or did you mean next year :-). >> >> > the ncg, and one consequence of that that simon marlow remarked upon at >> > icfp is that would perhaps make it easier to add new targets to ncg. >> >> As soon as that NCG cleanup is ready for public consumption, please >> let me know so I can validate the PowerPC NCG. I think I am one of >> the few people who regularly builds GHC on PowerPC and even I haven't >> done it for two weeks because I just moved house. >> >> Cheers, >> Erik >> -- >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Erik de Castro Lopo >> http://www.mega-nerd.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> ghc-devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
