On 09/01/14 20:08, George Colpitts wrote:
Does LLVM have the same limitation that its register allocator does not reuse spill slots for variables that have disjoint live ranges? If not, could the library be compiled with llvm?
Let me reiterate: the SHA-1 library compiles just fine, provided the -fregs-graph flag is not used with GHC 7.8.1. As far as I know it compiles when using the LLVM backend too, but you don't have to use LLVM: the NCG works fine.
Cheers, Simon
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Adam Wick <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Jan 8, 2014, at 2:42 AM, Simon Marlow <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Neither of the register allocators reuse spill slots for variables that have disjoint live ranges, so the fact that we ran out of spill slots is not necessarily indicative of terrible code (but I agree that it's a strong hint).That’s the problem with SHA, then. The implementation (and the spec, really) is essentially a long combination of the form: let x_n5 = small_computation x_n1 x_n2 x_n3 x_n4 x_n6 = small_computation x_n2 x_n3 x_n4 x_n5 … Which has ~70 entries. The actual number of live variables alive at any time should be relatively small, but if slots aren’t getting reused there’s going to be some significant blowup. (To be honest, I had figured — and thought I had validated — that doing it this way would give the compiler the best chance at generating optimal code, but it appears I merely set myself up to hit this limitation several years later.) - Adam _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
