On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Johan Tibell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Austin Seipp <[email protected]>wrote: > >> That sounds good to me. I'm setting up the RC2 builds now, so we can >> update our Cabal copy to the latest release after that, for the final >> release. Right now we're at e97aa58f68519db54de1c62339459ebb88aed069, >> which is just ahead of 1.18.1.3. >> > > (Note that 1.18.1.3 is not a released version, just a version bump in the > repo in preparation for the release.) > > The 1.18 branch is currently at 0d5ffeb91075739246627da17bda945aedc6a427 > and I'm worried that ee6d1cf5cefe18f6d74ed379af21d92f8b0ae92d hasn't seen > enough testing. Duncan suggested ( > https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/1660) that this change should be > included in a GHC RC, but since that's a bit annoying I'll try a Cabal RC > instead. > I just announce a RC1 for Cabal/cabal-install. In case you do any more GHC RCs, please update the GHC repo to the latest cabal 1.18 HEAD.
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
