Add another build type for your use case. The "quick" build means
"build everything as quickly as possible", which is useful for general
development, but not benchmarking.
Cheers,
Simon
On 08/03/2014 07:45, Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi,
In my mind the "quick" build should be like the "perf" build, except
building the stage2 compiler should be much faster. However, the perf
build uses
GhcLibHcOpts = -O2
while the quick build uses
GhcLibHcOpts = -O -fasm
This means that if you're working on optimizing the generated code and
are running benchmarks to verify your results, the quick build doesn't
do the right thing.
Since the purpose of the quick build is to work on the stage2 compiler,
would it make sense having it build the libraries in the same way as the
perf build?
-- Johan
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
