I'm now building the source distribution and sanity checking it before I push the tags. Stay tuned.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Austin Seipp <[email protected]> wrote: > This fix is now merged in the 7.8 branch and is ready to go. Unless > someone speaks soon, I'm going to go ahead and start the builds... > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Austin Seipp <[email protected]> wrote: >> This seems good to me. I'll go ahead and prep the tree then and get >> some things ready. >> >> To everyone: I'm going to carefully review the outstanding patches etc >> besides #8979, but I'm not inclined to take very many - if any - >> besides this one. So if you missed the 7.8.1 train, but you *really* >> want something in 7.8.2, please talk to me soon... >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Simon Peyton Jones >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Austin, Simon (and others) >>> >>> As you’ll see from https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8978, I succeeded >>> in introducing a new bug into 7.8.1 post RC2, when fixing #8913. And it >>> seems to matter. (Because of the windows seg-fault saga, RC2 was active for >>> a long time, and none of our regression tests showed up this bug.) >>> >>> It looks to me that we have little choice but to push out 7.8.2, more or >>> less immediately, and advise everyone to ignore 7.8.1. Do you agree? >>> >>> Sorry about this. >>> >>> Simon >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant >> Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ > > > > -- > Regards, > > Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant > Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ -- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
