On Thursday 24 April 2014, 14:04:13, Austin Seipp wrote: > Can you try another LLVM version? LLVM 3.2 has been known to be > particularly problematic - I believe me and David looked into this a > while back, and we couldn't get even get the compiler to bootstrap > with it at one point, let alone figure out what the hell was going on > (I'll see if I can find the ticket related to this). LLVM 3.3 or LLVM > 3.4 should work just fine, and you can put them on the front of your > $PATH before running the testsuite to check this.
Okay, I got myself a 3.4, and it seems to work. I'll re-run the testsuite and see what failures remain. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
