Hi,
Am Samstag, den 10.05.2014, 16:12 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2014, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > For now I added a reqlib('transformers') to the test, hoping that that
> > helps. But why should the error message mention "transformers" at all
> > when the package import is actually explicit to import "nonexisting"?
>
> that did not help, further supporting my theory that something strange
> was with SPJ’s work tree. Maybe for some reason transformers got
> de-registered in your package data base?
>
> Can someone else with an up-to-date tree run "make TEST=T5979" and see
> if it works for him?
now I also get SPJ’s output. I did not get it until I ran "git submodule
update && make", and the reason might be that now, two versions of
transformers are registered in the inplace data base
$ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg list|grep transformers
transformers-0.3.0.0
transformers-0.4.0.0
and after
$ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg unregister transformers-0.3.0.0
I get the original output.
Reverting the test output for now.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
e-Mail: [email protected]
Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de
Jabber-ID: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
