On 05/12/2014 05:34 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: > On 05/12/2014 09:51 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: >> On 05/12/2014 12:41 AM, Gergely Risko wrote:> The following message is a >> courtesy copy of an article >>> that has been posted to gmane.comp.lang.haskell.ghc.devel as well. >>> >>> On Sun, 11 May 2014 21:42:45 +0200, Mateusz Kowalczyk >> <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Are there any downsides to doing this except slightly bigger binary size? >>> >>> There are license issues if you want to distribute the resulting stuff. >>> Have to ask your lawyers about lgpl + gmp + shipping binary only stuff. >>> On the technical side, there are no other downsides. >>> >>>> Sorry, you're correct, I did not pass interactive. Find attached the >>>> strace with --interactive. >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Actually, I'm doing this already: >>>> >> https://github.com/Fuuzetsu/nix-project-defaults/blob/master/ghc/default.nix >>> >>> At the end of your strace, I see this: >>> Loading package integer-gmp ... [pid 10676] >>> [...] >>> >>> So you can see that it tries to read libgmp from a lot of places, but >>> not from the one you specified in build.mk, so this seems to be a build >>> system bug. >>> >>> The last commit in GHC that I tried and succeeded to compile 2 weeks ago >>> with a very similar setup as yours was this: >>> 12332f1add3eb9615a62abb36898819b2e67e865 >>> >>> Can you please try that so we can rule on whether there was a change >>> very recently that broke this. >>> >>>> I am even running 'patchPhase && configurePhase && buildPhase' which >>>> should technically be exactly what nix does with the package in nixpkgs. >>>> By the way, the official nix package for HEAD isn't quite HEAD but >>>> instead a snapshot of somewhere near HEAD and in fact I'm the person >>>> that opened an issue and a PR to get that updated. The fact that it >>>> builds that but doesn't build when I'm in the source tree makes me >>>> wonder what's different. >>> >>> I see. I'm flying out in 10 hours for vacation, so won't have time to >>> reproduce your issue and look into this more deeply. If you figure out >>> what's happening, please send me a summary. >> >> Enjoy your vacation. >> >>> Maybe you should move this thread to the gmane.linux.distributions.nixos >>> mailing list from here, because I guess Peter Simons and co can help you >>> more with this, than GHC devs. >> >> Perhaps I should. I have tried with --with-intree-gmp and >> DYNAMIC_BY_DEFAULT=OFF and they both fail at the same time. Next stop is >> to try to build from some snapshots to see whether the problem is recent. >> >>> If I find the bandwidth during travels, I will try to keep an eye on this. >>> >>> Gergely >>> >> >> > > Today I built the snapshots from 20140430[1] and 20140510[2] without a > problem (just had to not build the postscript docs as those failed) > which makes me think there's either something wrong with my tree or > these snapshots do something that stops the problem from coming up. > > [1]: http://deb.haskell.org/dailies/2014-04-30/ghc_7.9.20140430.orig.tar.bz2 > [2]: http://deb.haskell.org/dailies/2014-05-11/ghc_7.9.20140510.orig.tar.bz2 >
After these attempts, I deleted my whole ghc tree and cloned it fresh. It has built successfully. Clearly ‘make clean’ is not doing its job properly somewhere but at this point I'm just happy I finally got it to build. -- Mateusz K. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
