Hi, I suddenly get
Unexpected failures:
gadt T7294 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile GADT1 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile GADT11 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile GADT3 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile IndTypesPerf [bad exit code] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile NonLinearLHS [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile Numerals [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile Roman1 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile Simple9 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile T2219 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile T2627 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile T3484 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile T4935 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_compile T7585 [exit code non-0] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail T2664a [exit code non-0] (normal)
polykinds PolyKinds10 [exit code non-0] (normal)
polykinds PolyKinds12 [exit code non-0] (normal)
polykinds T6002 [exit code non-0] (normal)
simplCore/should_compile T5329 [exit code non-0] (normal)
simplCore/should_run T5315 [exit code non-0] (optasm)
typecheck/should_compile T5490 [exit code non-0] (normal)
typecheck/should_compile T7196 [exit code non-0] (normal)
after these three changes were pushed:
Changes to ghc:
commit 214ad2d24cda4aaef541df3e213d5c4845f95c71
Author: Peter Trommler <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Apr 30 11:41:51 2014 +0200
Fix globalRegMaybe for unregisterised build.
In commit 83a003f globalRegMaybe will be called but panics
for unregisterised compilers.
In an unregisterised compiler there are no global registers
so always return `Nothing`.
Fixes #9055.
commit 21f17d06aa5c33e639f1b0d37b4bf888b494c441
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Tue May 13 13:17:19 2014 +0100
Fix invariant in mkAppCoFlexible
mkAppCoFlexible was breaking the invariant that the head of a
TyConAppCo cannot
be a type synonym. This small patch fixes it.
commit 4cfc1fae11ec9a5c4b34ac747f0ce50f52423eba
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Tue May 13 13:15:45 2014 +0100
Lint should check that TyConAppCo doesn't have a synonym in the
tycon position
That is why Lint didn't nail Trac #9102
Full log at
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/25063931/log.txt. It
seems that most, if not all, fail with a "Synonym in TyConAppCo" lint
error.
If Lint is correct here, then this may indicate further bugs are around.
But in that case the correct thing would be to have a ticket number for
that problem and mark all failing test cases as expect_broken – it’s the
only sensible way of having an always succeeding test suite in master.
So is the Lint check correct and this uncovered one or more bugs here,
or is the Lint check actually too restrictive?
Greetings,
Joachim
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
[email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
