Or better still use do-notation like the rest of the compiler. That'd be great thatnks.
You could de-tabify and remove white space at the same time SImon | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan | Stolarek | Sent: 30 June 2014 10:28 | To: [email protected] | Subject: Cleanup of RnExpr, RnEnv and RnSource | | Dear all, | | RnExpr, RnEnv and RnSource (in compiler/renamer) declare locally: | | \begin{code} | -- XXX | thenM :: Monad a => a b -> (b -> a c) -> a c thenM = (>>=) | | thenM_ :: Monad a => a b -> a c -> a c | thenM_ = (>>) | \end{code} | | and then use these aliases instead of >>= and >>. These were introduced | by Ian in | 6c7b41cc2b24f533697a62bf1843507ae043fc97 in 2008 and later partially | cleaned up by Simon in | f0c99958649b8909612b1b9c9b48aad970dfce05 in 2009. Would there be | objections if I cleand this up (ie. remove thenM and thenM_ and use >>= | and >>)? Is anyone doing any substantial changes on any of these files | and suspects that this could introduce merge conflicts for him? I'm at | the moment changing some things in RnExpr, so doing this will only add | little extra work for me and I'd like to take this oportunity to have | cleaner code. | | Janek | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | [email protected] | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
