Dear Sven, glad to you are making progress!
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2014, 18:05 -0400 schrieb David Feuer: > I think I may have figured out at least part of the reason that > cons/build gives bad results. I actually ran into a clue when working > on scanl. It seems at least part of the problem is that a rule like > > x : build g = build (\c n -> c x (g c n)) > > makes (:) look "interesting" to the inliner. I think that by now your know more about rules and the inliner than the average reader of ghc-devs, and not all of us know what it means if something is interesting to the inliner. So mostly out of curiosity: What happens with interesting things, and why is it bad for (:)? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
