-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/09/14 09:31, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > Well, it *is* a language extension, exactly like lots of other > language extensions, isn't it? (E.g. UnicodeSyntax.) What > alternative action, exactly, are you proposing? Why do you propose > to treat it differently to other language extensions? I would be > reluctant to simply add it without any indication; then GHC would > accept non-Haskell 2010 programs. And we have not done that with > other extensions. If this policy has been followed that firmly then I too am reluctant to go against it. A pragma it is then. - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlQhI9gACgkQRtClrXBQc7X4kAEAn5XrGTFZa0AR372xPEKS2ddE vt5DYJ+wU+xjYW6HYSYBAKMqdL3bO7Q8GNNQmX4OQhcrwvpQcSov17F2E5FyFrI/ =BGZA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
