On 10/8/2014 1:03 AM, Austin Seipp wrote:
I hide 'empty' and 'foldr' at importing point and the code compiles.
Has anyone see the same issues?
Ugh, this is some fallout I thought we had fixed, but apparently not.
I'll fix it shortly, thanks.
[...]
Why does ghc-stage1.exe use so much memory?
Wow, I thought we fixed this one too! Please see this bug:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9630
What GHC commit are you using? Are your submodules all up to date? In
particular, if 'binary' is not up to date, even if the rest of your
tree is, you'll see this problem.
Ah, I know what causes the building failure now...
After cloning ghc repository, I switch every sub-module to Master (it is
usually HEAD) branch.
I am in the habit of thinking Master is always the latest.
But it is not the case with ghc. For example, the fix mentioned in
ticket 9630
was submitted to ghc-head branch[1], but the Master/HEAD is way old[2].
And it seems there is some other submodule is like this.
Now after cloning ghc repository, if I don't switch to any branch --
'git branch'
will show all submodules are detached -- the build will succeed.
So why the Master/HEAD branches don't have the latest code?
Thanks,
cg
[1] http://git.haskell.org/packages/binary.git/log/refs/heads/ghc-head
[2] http://git.haskell.org/packages/binary.git/log/refs/heads/master
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
