Speaking for myself, I don't think the question of doing a 7.8.4 release at all needs to be entangled with the LTS issue.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Edward Z. Yang <ezy...@mit.edu> wrote: > Excerpts from Herbert Valerio Riedel's message of 2014-10-08 00:59:40 > -0600: > > However, should GHC 7.8.x turn out to become a LTS-ishly maintained > > branch, we may want to consider converting it to a similiar Git > > structure as GHC HEAD currently is, to avoid having to keep two > > different sets of instructions on the GHC Wiki for how to work on GHC > > 7.8 vs working on GHC HEAD/7.10 and later. > > Emphatically yes. Lack of submodules on the 7.8 branch makes working with > it /very/ unpleasant. > > Edward > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
