Sure, but how often does the API deal with types that aren't defined by `ghc` or `base`? ByteString is one case I can think of, if you want to muck about with FastStrings without the overhead of Strings.
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 09:59, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: > How feasible would it be to add this feature to GHC? At a first glance it > seems like it would help substantially > > Only until you need to hand off data between them, sadly. > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates > [email protected] [email protected] > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
