Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2014, 22:02 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: > So I'm all for keeping 'oneShot' in the definition of foldl or > whatever, even if the analysis spots it. But with a Note please! Three Notes actually! :-) I created three mouth-sized commits, each of which can be reviewed independently: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D391 https://phabricator.haskell.org/D392 https://phabricator.haskell.org/D393 You can also review the wip/oneShot branch if you prefer that or want to play around with it. The Wiki page will see some updates (e.g. moving „Challenges“ to „Implementation“) when I get to merge these. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
