| $m?P :: forall (r :: ?) a. [T a] -> R(r) -> R(r) -> r | | where R(r) = Void# -> r if r :: # | , r otherwise | | Is there a way to do that?
No indeed. | Now, to cut down on the amount of code generated, I guess we could | have | | $m?P :: forall (r :: ?) a. [T a] -> (Void# -> r) -> (Void# -> r) -> r | | and always compile pattern synonym match continuations into lambdas | over this dummy Void#, but I thought we also wanted to avoid that... I think that's fine. These matchers will usually be inlined and all the clutter will go away. | Note that if P were to have arguments, the same problem would still be | present with the fail continuation (but not the success one). Yes, let's take advantage of that S _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
