> > On a related note, how about separating test failures from failing
> > performance tests ("stat too good" / "stat not good enough")? The latter
> are
> > important, but they seem to be much more prone to fail without good
> reason.
>
> I also think this is a good idea.
>https://phabricator.haskell.org/D406 -- Gintautas Miliauskas
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
