Glad people are excited about this, I like "beginner/intermediate/advanced". I think it's more accurate than "easy/hard" and clearer than "accessible", "welcoming", etc.
I also want to call out the "mentor" label that the Rust team is using: experienced devs nominate themselves as mentors on projects, then newcomers can tackle them with some support. As a newcomer, that's *extremely* appealing to me. Cheers, Ike On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Joachim Breitner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The quality that we are looking for is “tacklabe by a newcomer“, i.e. >> not requiring too deep knowledge of GHC. Is there a nice word for that? >> I found “accessible”, “welcoming”, “appealing” – anything that sounds >> good in native English speaker’s ears? :-) >> > > Various projects I'm involved with use > > difficulty: beginner (or just "beginner") > babydev-bait (!) > newcomer (several use "newbie" but I do not recommend that label) > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine > associates > [email protected] > [email protected] > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad > http://sinenomine.net > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
