Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 18:49 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 16:48 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > >> > What would be a reliable way to make the build system pass > >> > -B/usr/bin/ld.gold to gcc? Is > >> > SRC_HC_OPTS += -optc-B/usr/bin/ld.gold > >> > in mk/build.mk a good idea? > >> > > >> Indeed this is much cleaner. I just wanted a way to accomplish this > >> without editing build.mk. > > > > Cleaner maybe, but it was not picked up either. Or maybe we are looking > > at a different issue, not solved by using ld.gold? > > > I suspect that it this is the gold issue. I should have looked at your > command line a bit more carefully; I suspect you want > > SRC_HC_OPTS += -optl-B/usr/bin/ld.gold > > Hopefully this will do it; at least the option appears to make it to the > right phase now. Trying it right now... > Is the Debian packaging tracked in version control somewhere? All I can > find is the packaging tarball [1]. It’s at http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/experimental/ghc (but due to a index.html in that directory, you cannot browse it, so you have to "darcs get" it) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
