Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> writes: > Hi, > > > Am Montag, den 08.12.2014, 08:20 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: >> > Again Google finds me a bug, but this time one that has no fix >> > associated with it: >> > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8951 >> > >> > Ben, can you help me out here? >> > >> I've been unable to reproduce this issue in my environment. The build >> succeeded using your packaging on my Odroid XU running Debian Jessie. > > Weird. Can you try creating a sid chroot and building it in there? > > I managed to finish the build with this patch attached: > Great!
> So what does that tell us? Maybe Peter can help us: Is it normal for a > Debian system to pretend that its a pre-v6 ARM, even if the actual > hardware is not? > Could you confirm that arm_HOST_ARCH_PRE_ARMv6 is actually defined in mk/config.h? If so we should try to figure out why. The architecture is determined by autoconf. Perhaps you could attach config.log? >> >> It seems that this is likely due to dh_autoreconf which overwrites all >> config.subs with /usr/share/misc/config.sub. It's totally unclear to me >> how the first build succeeded, however. >> >> Have you seen this in the past? > > Yes, likely a bug in dh_autoreconf that does not handle rebuilds well > (or a bug in how we use it). > Hmm, alright. Why exactly do we overwrite config.sub and config.guess? I guess we are trying to ensure that the build systems in libraries/* are generated by the system's autoconf (taking the place of `boot`)? Is there a reason we can't just use autoreconf as `boot` does? Cheers, - Ben
pgp2Z1Ygbrp2f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
