I'm not sure what the criteria are either, but I guess DeriveAnyClass is comparable to the other extensions mentioned.
Cheers, Pedro On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > | ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in > | T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC > | 7.10? > > I'm not sure what criteria you'd like to use! > > PatternSynonyms, PartialTypeSignatures, and NamedWildCards are all pretty > stable and should go in. > > StaticPointers will definitely continue to be there in future; but the > details of the API may change, and the current implementation is very much > a prototype. > > DeriveAnyClass: I defer to Pedro > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Herbert Valerio Riedel [mailto:[email protected]] > | Sent: 18 December 2014 22:14 > | To: Simon Peyton Jones > | Cc: Johan Tibell; Austin Seipp; Duncan Coutts > | Subject: Which language extensions to register for Cabal 1.22? > | > | Hello Simon, > | > | ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in > | T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC > | 7.10? > | > | - "DeriveAnyClass" > | - "PatternSynonyms" > | - "PartialTypeSignatures" > | - "NamedWildcards" > | - "StaticPointers" > | > | Cheers, > | hvr > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
