I went ahead and pushed it. Edward
Excerpts from Simon Peyton Jones's message of 2015-01-05 09:37:38 -0800: > Let's do it! Austin, would you like to commit this? > > Reason: simplifies build system, in exchange for dropping a feature that no > one uses. > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Edward Z. Yang [mailto:[email protected]] > | Sent: 02 January 2015 21:58 > | To: Simon Peyton Jones; [email protected] > | Subject: Re: Compiling nofib-analyse > | > | Attached is a patch which axes HTML support in nofib-analyse. > | I would Phab it but I don't know how to do that for submodules. > | > | Maybe we should drop the LaTeX support too! > | > | Edward > | > | Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of 2014-12-30 19:10:56 -0500: > | > Pretty sure it's the aptly named 'html'. > | > https://hackage.haskell.org/package/html > | > > | > I can't remember the last time I used the HTML reporting capability, > | > so I'd be happy about removing it. > | > > | > Edward > | > > | > Excerpts from Simon Peyton Jones's message of 2014-12-30 07:03:17 - > | 0500: > | > > When building nofib-analyse (in nofib), I get > | > > > | > > /home/simonpj/local/bin/ghc -O -cpp --make Main -o nofib-analyse > | > > > | > > Main.hs:14:18: > | > > Could not find module 'Text.Html' > | > > Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. > | > > > | > > There are rather a lot of HTML packages. Which one is needed? > | Does this meant that it's essential to install this package before > | running nofib, a manual step? > | > > > | > > I wonder if it'd be better to remove the HTML dependency, or make > | it optional? > | > > > | > > Simon _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
