Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2015, 08:37 +0100 schrieb Herbert Valerio Riedel: > One thing to keep in mind though is that then 'haskeline' (which is > needed by GHCi) still remains a consumer of 'transformers', so we'd > still have to bundle a 'transformers' package version with GHC even if > `ghc` doesn't depend on it anymore. Somewhat related, the `ghc` -> > `Cabal` dependency was broken up in GHC 7.10 but we'll still bundle > `Cabal` with GHC 7.10.
although there has been talk about only shipping the .so file with a clash-free name or path... was this not done simply because noone bothered enough to actually do it, or was there a bigger problem? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
