On 01/29/2015 08:54 PM, Austin Seipp wrote: > After thinking about it a little, I'm fine with pushing the release out to > March. I think #9858 is the more serious of our concerns vs a raging > debate, too. > > My only concern really is dealing with the merging of such a patch. For > example, if the patch to fix this is actually as wide ranging as we believe > to the type hacker, I can definitely foresee a merge conflict, with, say, > the recent -fwarn-redundant-constraints, which I've managed to leave out of > 7.10 so far. > > In any case, with some more time, we can work those details out.
Oh, you silly implementers, you! :D Regards, _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
