Hi * for what it's worth, I really like the idea. Its purpose is clear, it's easy to use, it's straightforward to understand, and it seems there are only benefits that come with it.
I at least would be an immediate user, as it gives a compile-time fence to custom hard-coded stuff. E.g. it is sometimes simpler and nicer to put something in a string literal rather than an explicit AST. (Just my 2 cents -- I'm not a TH expert.) On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Merijn Verstraaten <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been repeatedly running into problems with overloaded literals and > partial conversion functions, so I wrote up an initial proposal ( > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ValidateMonoLiterals) and I'd like > to commence with the bikeshedding and hearing other opinions :) > > Cheers, > Merijn > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > -- Carl Eyeinsky
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
