Hi Randy, This is due to an upstream Haddock bug I didn't manage to fix before the release; see https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10206 - we really need to fix this for 7.10.2.
I believe the problem we need to fix is in Haddock. The fact that the non-hierarchical version appears on the website is just so people can browse it (and FWIW, the 'correct links' are there, but obviously the hyperlinks *to* the proper places are broken...) On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Randy Polen <[email protected]> wrote: > The HP build expects that the html docs for the ghc-bundled packages will be > in > heirarchical directories, based on the package name (e.g., GHC.Magic docs in > libraries/ghc-prim-0.3.1.0/GHC-Magic.html) which is how it has been for many > ghc releases. In 7.10.1, I thought it was an error but it seems the > haskell.org docs reflect this new, flat way (e.g,. GHC.Magic docs in > libraries/GHC-Magic.html). > > > Just want to make sure this is what is expected, and then change the HP > build code accordingly. > > > Follow up question: should the HP-bundled docs do the same thing? Is the > > flat model the way to go for all the docs? Won't this cause collisions for > > updated packages? > > > Randy > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > -- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
