Re: release timing

Thu, 07 May 2015 00:47:53 -0700 

#10293 should go in as it's a (significant?) regression.
 
It would be nice to see #8224 in as well, but doesn't look like that's going to 
be fixed any time soon! Have GHC HQ ever considered asking Intel if they'd be 
willing to lend a hand?                                     
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to