I wrote: >> Keeping the license as is seems to be important to Malcolm. >> So could we have an option to build GHC without cpphs >> and instead use it as a stand-alone external program? >> That would make the situation no worse than GMP.
Bardur Arantsson wrote: > I don't see any need for an option. Just bundle cpphs together with GHC > and build/use it as an external program. AFAICT this has absolutely no > licensing implications for GHC, derived from GHC or anything compiled > with GHC. Agreed, that would work. But I thought that the idea was that we wanted it actually integrated into GHC. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
