On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:42 AM, David Luposchainsky < dluposchain...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think there are two important consequences of MonadFail. First of all, > we can > all safely write failable patterns if we so desire. Second, the compiler > can > ensure other people's codebases do not lie to us (knowingly or > unknowingly). > The second is a bit overstated I think. Any function you call can still have partial pattern matches in all the other places Haskell allows them and you wouldn't know from the type.
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
