Hi, Am Freitag, den 26.06.2015, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Freitag, den 26.06.2015, 16:40 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: > > The builds seem to be failing with perf failures for > > > > haddock.Cabal > > > > haddock.compiler > > > > but that doesn't seem to happen for me. It looks as though it > > started with > > > > rGHC*rGHC0b7e538a09bc: Allow recursive unwrapping of data > > families > > I can confirm this, if you look at > https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/ > you see that that commit is the only in red¹ > > Here is the report for that commit: > https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#revision/0b7e538a09bc958474ec704063eaa088 > 36e9270e > and you can fetch the numbers from there, or from the full build log at > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nomeata/ghc-speed-logs/master/0b7e538a09bc958474ec704063eaa08836e9270e.log > > It looks very reproducible as well: > https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#graph/tests/alloc/haddock.Cabal;hl=0b7e53 > 8a09bc958474ec704063eaa08836e9270e
has this confusion cleared up? According to https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#graph/testsuite/unexpected%20stats;hl=0b7 e538a09bc958474ec704063eaa08836e9270e these tests are still failing on my machine. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
