On 04/07/2015 at 21:26:31 +0200, Sven Panne wrote: > To me the fundamental question which should be answered before any detail > question is: Should we go on and continuously break minor things (i.e. > basically give up any stability guarantees) or should we collect a bunch of > changes first (leaving vital things untouched for that time) and release > all those changes together, in longer intervals? That's IMHO a tough > question which we somehow avoided to answer up to now. I would like to see > a broader discussion like this first, both approaches have their pros and > cons, and whatever we do, there should be some kind of consensus behind it.
Potentially we ought to await Backpack [0], which should make such transitions easier. [0] http://plv.mpi-sws.org/backpack/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
