Hi, On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But INLINABLE has its own semantics (i.e. “do retain a copy of the > RHS”), and NOINLNE does, as far as I know, not imply this. Ok. > But maybe your idea works with > > NOINLINE[n] becomes MAY_INLINE_FROM[n] > NOINLINE[~n] becomes MAY_INLINE_BEFORE[n] Even better. INLINE[n] becomes MUST_INLINE_FROM[n] > INLINE[~n] becomes MUST_INLINE_BEFORE[n] > I added this option, without the `MUST_` (it doesn't add much in my opinion), as proposal 3 to https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Proposal/SelfExplinatoryInlinePragmas .. Anyone have other suggestions? Thomas
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
