On 03/09/2015 10:53, Thomas Miedema wrote:
The real hint is that "the number of contributions will go up". That's
a noble goal and I think it's at the heart of this proposal.
When you're going to require contributors to use a non-standard tool
to get patches to your code review system, it better just work. `arc`
is clearly failing us here, and I'm saying enough is enough.
Not only this, but there's (probably) lots of small/janitorial
contributions that do not need the full power of phabricator or any
sophisticated code review.
Not accepting github PRs and forcing everyone to go through an uncommon
tool (however formidable), is quite likely to turn those contributions
away IMHO.
--
Vincent
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
