How about ghc-datatypes? ghc-core-data seems like it would have something to do with the Core language and ghc-integration sounds like it is a layer on top of ghc.
Using the -types suffix has quite som precedence [1] for packages defining shared datatypes (as does the -core suffix), but given Malcolms comment it is perhaps not a good fit for GHC. [1]: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/search?terms=types Adam Sandberg Eriksson On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, at 05:50 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:28 AM, malcolm.wallace > <[email protected]> wrote: >> "ghc-types" sounds like a package for fancy type hackery. I would >> never think to find language extension flags in such a place. How >> about "ghc-package-db", or "ghc-language-extensions"? > > ghc-integration ghc-core-data > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine > associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, > kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net > _________________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
