Hi, Am Dienstag, den 03.11.2015, 08:47 -0600 schrieb Austin Seipp: > Isn't armel the (old, but not EABI-very-old) pre-hardware-floating > point ABI?
I believe so, but I’m sure Erik knows better. > In any case, this is fallout from > 933adc0f31164cb651d11ecfcfe612ac429f714f, but fixing it means we'd > need to add in several more code paths to handle this case... So I > suppose we should probably file a ticket and get that fixed for 8.0 Well, it is a regression over 7.10.2; such a thing should not happen in a stable point release, shouldn’t it? Filed a ticket at https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11058 Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
