The executable-path package wraps this up nicely with its `getScriptPath` function:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/executable-path-0.0.3/docs/System-Environment-Executable.html#v:getScriptPath Probably best to use this existing function. Then, if a less fragile solution comes along, getScriptPath can do that instead. -Michael On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Levent Erkok <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! That indeed does work. > > I'm a bit surprised though that there isn't already an internal boolean > set somewhere; checking for a string in the arguments sounds a bit fragile. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Aycan İrican <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> How about `GHC.Environment.getFullArgs` which includes “—interactive” >> when you’re in GHCi? >> >> >> > On 24 Nov 2015, at 09:37, Levent Erkok <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I'm working on a plugin, and would like to be able to tell if it's GHC >> or GHCi that's running. >> > >> > I tried: >> > >> > df <- getDynFlags >> > let isGHCi = ghcMode df == CompManager >> > >> > Alas, while that correctly tells apart "ghci" from "ghc -c", it also >> returns True when ghc is called without the "-c" argument. >> > >> > Is there a better/more robust way of figuring out whether we're in an >> interactive session? >> > >> > -Levent. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ghc-devs mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
