As I wrote that I came to the same conclusion, but decided to leave the rest in case.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:25 AM, GHC <[email protected]> wrote: > #11028: Refactor ConDecl > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: simonpj | Owner: alanz > Type: bug | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: > Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2 > Resolution: | Keywords: > Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: > | Unknown/Multiple > Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case: > Blocked By: | Blocking: > Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): > Wiki Page: | > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Comment (by simonpj): > > > Alternatively, everything except the `rnLHsType` in `rnConResult` can > move to the type checking. > > That sounds exactly right. `Note [Sorting out the result type]` in > `RdrHsSyn` seems entirely redundant with the new `ConDeclGADT` form. > > -- > Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11028#comment:25> > GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> > The Glasgow Haskell Compiler >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
