Richard Eisenberg <e...@cis.upenn.edu> writes: > Hi devs, > > On my kind=type branch (D808), I have this test failure for > stranal/sigs/UnsatFun: > Hmmm. I was curious and so took the opportunity to do a bit of digging. This likely isn't helpful but you never know...
> -UnsatFun.g: <B,1*U(U)>b > +UnsatFun.g: <L,U(U)> It looks like the strictness analyzer can no longer see that `g` is bottoming (hence the missing `b`), which unfortunately seems to be exactly what this test is testing for. :( Moreover, the `B` changing to an `L` means that the demand analysis can't see that any demand is made of the first argument. > -UnsatFun.h: <C(S),1*C1(U(U))> > +UnsatFun.h: <S,1*U> This is the helper used by `g`. Again, it looks like something is going awry here with strictness analysis as the argument which was previously deemed "call-demand" is now just "strict". > -UnsatFun.g': <L,1*U(U)> > +UnsatFun.g': <L,U(U)> > > -UnsatFun.h2: <S,1*U><L,1*C1(U(U))> > +UnsatFun.h2: <S,1*U><L,1*U> This appears to be a very similar test which is likely failing for a similar reason. Could you perhaps collect the Core for this test before and after your patch?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
