On Dec 17, 2015, at 1:31 PM, George Karachalias <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> My single last concern is what I wrote earlier: "Flags 2 and 3 are a bit
> tricky: Actual bailing
> will uglify the code and make it much more complicated so I would prefer in
> practice to just
> check up front with a good metric whether the possibility to be
> non-performant is high and in
> these cases just not call the checker at all."
>
> If we agree on this one, I am gonna wrap it up in the next 2 days. :-)
I'm quite happy with this. My thought is that if it's a bit wrong, that's OK --
we'll refine the settings over time.
Others?
Richard
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
