On 1/22/16 11:36 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > On 2016-01-22 at 17:23:18 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: >> I didn't mean to suggest that DPH should be part of every build, just >> that it should be part of *some* regular build. >> >> If we're willing to do that, then I'm certainly willing to get DPH >> back up and running. > What's the situation with the `vector`/`primitive` packages if DPH is to > be resuscitated? Does the official `vector` package need to be made > DPH-aware? >
The vector and primitive packages will not need to be changed in any significant way, and perhaps not at all. It's possible we might need a few patches to vector to, e.g., expose a data constructor somewhere, so I can't promise that we will need zero changes. Geoff _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs