Ben, > Wouldn't > > git clone git://github.com/snowleopard/shaking-up-ghc shake-build > cabal install shake-build/ > > be sufficient?
As I understand, this will not take care of alex and happy? Although if we list them as dependencies in shaking-up-ghc.cabal, that will indeed be sufficient... I think it's a good idea :) Cheers, Andrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Gamari [mailto:b...@smart-cactus.org] > Sent: 23 January 2016 21:22 > To: Andrey Mokhov; Herbert Valerio Riedel; Tuncer Ayaz > Cc: GHC developers > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Shaking up GHC > > Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mok...@newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > > > Herbert, > > > >> I think it's already quite convenient. After all, you're expected to > >> have a minimum GHC bootstrapping environment anyway. So having the > >> tools installed (as already do now, e.g. you need alex, happy, and > >> ghc to be able to work on GHC). > > > > I agree. Roughly, we are talking about going from: > > > > cabal install alex happy > > > > to: > > > > cabal install alex happy ansi-terminal mtl shake QuickCheck > > > Wouldn't > > git clone git://github.com/snowleopard/shaking-up-ghc shake-build > cabal install shake-build/ > > be sufficient? > > Cheers, > > - Ben _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
