There's a bunch here. Believe me -- I'm working as fast as I can to wrap up these bugs.
Indeed! And believe me, we are grateful, both to you and other huge contributors. GHC is a pretty big enterprise. The intention is not to pile on pressure, but rather to share information. . No one is asking you to turn into superman/superwoman. It’s just that are many people working together, so sharing info about what can and cannot get done by date X is helpful. No more than that! Simon From: Richard Eisenberg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 January 2016 04:44 To: Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> Cc: Skull <[email protected]>; Geoffrey Mainland <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: GHC release candidate On Jan 26, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: • Richard: the ReturnTv stuff (branch wip/exp-types) Yes. I just pushed a candidate patch that may well validate. I'll merge tomorrow (Wed) on success. • Richard: #11471 (levity) This should hopefully be much easier than ExpTypes. Next Friday is a reasonable deadline. • Richard: documentation for TypeInType Sure. • Geoff: #11487 • Simon PJ: #11339 Richard, also if you look at https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-8.0.1 you can see “highest” priority tickets with you as owner, that are to do with TypeInType and TypeApplications. There's a bunch here. Believe me -- I'm working as fast as I can to wrap up these bugs. Unfortunately, our release cycle overlaps with the critical time for the academic job market, so GHC is competing with my need to get a job. If anyone reading this wants to offer me a job, that could indeed have a tangible effect on how quickly I scoop up these bugs! :) Richard Thanks Simon
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
